If you shared that old McSweeney‘s piece about “physical theories as women”, you can’t complain about Luce Irigaray calling $E = mc^2$ a “sexed equation”.
This is a famous remark by Irigaray that science fanboys like to trot out as proof that gender studies, or sociology of science, or whatever they don’t like at the moment is all bullshit. But when you dig up the source, it’s Irigaray basically spit-balling during a Q&A, taking a question and running with it.
Yet this example of “philosopher’s gonna philosophy” took on a life of its own when Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont quoted it (incompletely, as we shall see) in their book Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science. Richard Dawkins featured it prominently in his review of Fashionable Nonsense, and it doesn’t seem to have gone out of style since.
The full citation is L. Irigaray, “Sujet de la science, sujet sexué?”, in Sense et place des connaissances dans la société, 3 (Centre national de la recherche scientifique, 1987), pp. 109–110. (This is the third volume in a series; Sokal and Bricmont’s bibliography omits the volume number.) The question begins on p. 109:
Continue reading Sex and the Single Equation

